VFL Ladder

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
zebraman
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 47 min ago
Joined: 21/02/2004 - 00:00
Posts: 1786
VFL Ladder
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts 1 Geelong 9 7 2 0 0 0 1047 783 133.72 28 2 Sandringham 8 7 1 0 1 0 900 752 119.68 28 3 Williamstown 8 5 1 2 1 0 880 705 124.82 24 4 Coburg Tigers 8 5 3 0 1 0 851 793 107.31 20 5 Port Melbourne 8 4 3 1 1 0 822 741 110.93 18 6 Bendigo Bombers 9 4 5 0 0 924 876 105.48 16 7 Northern Bullants 8 4 4 0 1 0 727 740 98.24 16 8 North Ballarat 9 4 5 0 0 0 886 1005 88.16 16 9 Werribee 8 3 5 0 1 0 913 740 123.38 12 10 Frankston 7 3 4 0 2 0 592 646 91.64 12 11 Casey Scorpions 8 2 5 1 1 0 781 919 84.98 10 12 Box Hill Hawks 8 2 6 0 1 0 599 916 65.39 8 13 Tasmania 8 1 7 0 1 0 695 1001 69.43 4 I could have sworn that Geelong have lost 3 games this year..Sandy,Box Hill and Werribee... BUT...I stande to be corrected
Volunteer
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 7 months ago
Joined: 16/08/2005 - 00:00
Posts: 31
Zebraman, you are correct Geelong has losses to Sandy, Box Hill & Werribee the 4 points were allocated to Geelong not Werribee for this round. I noticed this when reading the Herald Sun today as they must take it off the VFL site as well.
caseyscorp
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: 06/12/2005 - 00:00
Posts: 573
It's not just the ladder that's wrong - the results page shows: Geelong 12.20-92 def. Werribee 15.17-107 Go figure! http://vfl.footballvic.com.au/?s=results
billythekid
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 22/11/2004 - 00:00
Posts: 2027
I also had a look at the ladder after reading the HUN but the VFL site was wrong also this is not good enough for a supposed professional organisation in 2007 - pleasee get it fixed VFL ASAP!
bcarbonaro
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 days ago
Joined: 01/09/2005 - 00:00
Posts: 2271
It's annoying because on a Sunday night or Monday morning I am trying to write my weekly wrap of the round and don't always get the correct info.